Home  |   About Us  |   Campaigns  |   Projects  |   Research  |   Press  |   Contact Us  |   Site Index
  The BMIC Campaign Other Campaigns..

Background     |    Current Situation   |    Documentation   |    Press   |    Images   |    Take Action

Various BMIC-related documents organized by category

Note on BMIC
Maps
Representations
Only recent representations are listed below. For earlier representations, please contact us

ESG has consistently written to the main Environmental regulatory agencies of the country concerned, the Ministry of Environment and Forests and the Karnataka State Pollution Control, drawing their attention to the irregualarites and serious environmental concerns from the BMIC project. These agencies have overlooked many of them and accorded Environmental clearance to the project.

Land Acquisition related correspondence
In reading the following letters, note that the Framework Agreement signed between NICE and the Government only allows for 20,193 acres of land to be allocated to NICE for the development of the peripheral road, link road, interchanges, expressway, and townships.
  • Letter from KIADB to BMICP dated August 4, 1999 showing that NICE has requested 28,186 acres of land (as opposed to 20,193 acress it is allowed under the Framework Agreement) which KIADB has asked BMICP to sanction!
  • Letter from KIADB to BMICP dated May 22, 2004 that indicates that 29,258 acres of land had been notified under Sec 3(1) of the KIADB Act in pursuant of an agreement signed between KIADB and NICE on 14th October 1998, and that upto 2759 acres are now being denotified. The letter also concludes that land was acquired on request of NICE and not on the basis of any technical drawings or maps or the project report (Page 1, Page 2)
Finance
Letters to Financial Institutions (and responses)

The role of Financial Institutions lending to this project is not transparent. ESG has deliberately sought to engage the concerned lending instituitions by seeking information on the financial aspects of the project.

ESG found that in violation of a Reserve Bank of India circular, stating that Banks should not fund Infrastructure projects based on State Government guarantees, ICICI Bank proceeded to fund the project after seeking such guarantees from the State Government. ESG registered a complaint on this violation against ICICI Bank with the RBI. Based on this complaint, RBI filed a case aganist ICICI Bank. This case was finally closed by the RBI without an investigation and merely on a reply from ICICI Bank.

Letters to Government Authorities
Letters to Elected Representatives
It is estimated that the project will affect nearly 2,00,000 people. Despite people strongly opposing this project, no effective action has been taken by the elected representatives. The project continues to recieve their tacit support. ESG raised many issues in a letter to the elected representatives of the State Legislature and Parliament urging them to take necessary action and shelve this project.
Clearances

Orders
  • Supreme Court order staying the High Court order approving the Project (Page 1, Page2)

top