|
1 |
LETTER
TO THE EDITOR
"Major
General S.G.Vombatkere, VSM (Retd)
M.E
(Struct), PhD (I.I.T), F.I.E (India), C.Eng
475, 7th Main RoadVijayanagar 1st Stage
E-mail
: sgvombatkere@hotmail.com MYSORE - 570 017
Tel
: 0821-2515187 22 December 2003
LETTER
TO THE EDITOR (By E-Mail)
Sir,
How
can Mr. Deve Gowda ""see Mr. Krishna's hand"" in the
BMIC scam when he was himself signatory to the original MOU as CM? (The
Hindu, 22.12.2003). Also, as a consequence of the MOU, the KIADB Act was
specially amended to permit use of the land acquired for a purpose even
other than that for which it was acquired.
However, those who have been protesting the BMIC Project on the grounds
that it is a monumental land scam will endorse Mr. Deve Gowda's assertion
about a scam. Protests against the BMIC Project have been routinely brushed
aside by all Governments starting with Mr. Deve Gowda's until date, and
the recent High Court judgement appears to have embarrassed many in as
well as out of power.
Rather
than pointing fingers, it would be well if the anti-BMIC agitators' demand
of improving SH-17 to 6-lanes and doubling the rail connection between
Bangalore and Mysore, already commenced, is implemented expeditiously
and with minimum corruption, and BMIC is given an unceremonious burial.
Yours faithfully,
Maj Gen S.G. Vombatkere (Retd)
sgvombatkere@hotmail.com
top |
|
2 |
"Dear
Sir,
In the
light of the foregoing, I endorse the stand taken by ESG in that the
proposing authority needs to make out a more convincing analysis of
the project and reshape the project to make it socially and economically
viable simultaneously. Roads are basically the first step in the prosperity
of India's population-spread over many a terrain as it is. But then,
the issue of cost and benefit is more important to determine where to
invest public expenditure. True, the Mysore-Bangalore link is also more
emotional and nostalgic than any other link in Karnataka, but then,
nostalgia and cost-benefit are different aspects. I hope my views are
clear by now.
With Regards
Yours Sincerely
Dr. S. Sundaramoorthy
sonykuty@md3.vsnl.net.in
top
|
|
3 |
"Hon'ble
Chief Minister S.M.Krishna,
Government of Karnataka,
Vidhan Soudha,
Bangalore 560001
Respected Sir,
You might kindly recall that I had
requested for your visit to Mysore in connection with holding a meeting
with members of MATF when I met you during Navarathri festival in Mysore.
I followed it up with a communication and you were kind enough to respond
immediately. In your reply you had mentioned that you are presently
busy and that you are instructing your OSD to fix a time. We are looking
forward to such a meeting. This specially oppertune because you have
announced that Mysore would be declared as a Heritage City. This is
a most important development for a long time.
I am digressing for the present on the isue of BMIC Project which is
hanging like a Damocles sword over us. Some of us have takenan in depth
look into it without prejudice the necessity for it. Since your government
has already taken up improving the existing road upto Maddur and further
improvement upto Mysore is already on the anvil it is oppertune for
all of us to make a dispassioante outlook for the necessity for BMIC
Project from not only about its technical relevance but also the impact
on people and the socio-cultural upheaval it will cause. Mysore still
retains the rural-urban ambience which is unique and visitors coming
from other urban centres like Delh and Bangalore feel a sense of relief
when they come to Mysore. Therefore, though urbanisation would be an
inevitable progression that all cities eventually to contend with, it
will be in our hands to see that developments takes place in a manner
that retains the uique nature of cities. Mysore is exceptional from
many considerations about which I need not dwell.
BMIC in my view apart from its technical drawbacks is fraught with causing
human misery which can be easily avoided. I wrote an article quite some
time ago on the subject arguing on the platform of technicality why
it should be abandoned. I am separately enclosing the article which
you may like to go throuh it and leave it your considered judgement.
In karnataka your governance has made a great impact and all of us feel
proud of your achievement in the realm of IT and Bio-Technology and
the general direction of development thrust both in rural and urban
Karnataka. Being a person of vision and a unique record of having been
judged successively as the best Chief Minister in India I do hope you
will bestow your earnest thought to the appeal contained in this letter.
With respectful regards
H.R.Bapu Satyanarayana
229, 12th Main, 2nd Cross,
Saraswathipuram,
Mysore 570009
vimbapu@sancharnet.in
|
|
4 |
I am surprised by your hope that appeals will work! The CM and his team
are just puppets in the hands of contractors and timber merchants.The
ONLY way out is the legal route.
First is to define what is public interest.If
the BDA forcibly acquires private land from one person to allot it to
another person , is it public interst ? Does the present owner have
no rights at all to his property? When the so called ""defence""/public
sector land or that of some church etc is to be acquired, it CANNOT
be done without negotiation.All this defence land etc was GIVEN to them
free of cost for a specific purpose. Let them produce ownership documents
to show that they ""OWN"" the land. They are just
caretakers and nothing more. The Trinity church has made a commercial
complex on land that was GIVEN to it. This land HAS NOT been purchased.
But a simple notification to acquire this is not enough.If that is so
how come private lands that have actually been purchased can be taken
?
Public interest is that which benefits
a majority if not all the people. Karnataka has become a permanent drought
/ famine case in the last four years under the new hitech govt. The
one and only one reason for this is the slaughter of trees and addition
of concrete. No amount of money or cloud seeding will get us rains.
Telling farmers not to grow certain crops will lead to shortage of those
crops as also the loss of livelihood to those farmers.It is now well
established that the widening of roads, BDA sites/flyovers, new airport
etc have resulted in the loss of greenery and addition of concrete which
cause increase in temperature / pollution and failure of monsoon. Planting
saplings in their place is a laughable joke. What is the survival rate
of thes saplings? how long will they take to become trees? It is just
like teliing a man ""we will take you away and give a kid
to your family in your place""! Is that not stupid? Long before
the even the start of construction of the new airport, international
flights are operating from the existing airport.In fact airlines are
competing to start operations from HAL airport. If that airport was
not suitable , how come so many flights are operating ?
Therefore these actions are obviously
NOT PUBLIC INTEREST and can therefore be halted by a court of law. The
govt that should be prosecuted for causing the shrinking water table
has the guts to say it will control ground water! BWSSB which cannot
supply adequate water charges you more if you have a borewell! the govt
that cannot meet the electricity demand has the guts to tax generators
that became necessary because of the failure of the system! There are
many many more points.
regards
K S Narayan
narayankay@yahoo.com
|
|
5 |
"Without malice towards Bangalore-Mysore Expressway
Bangalore -Mysore Expressway Project has become an emotive
issue. Opinions are divided about the merits and demerits about the
necessity for the project. This has happened because there has been
lack of transparency and selective release of information to downright
suppression of facts by the government. This has given rise to all sorts
of speculation and doubts in the minds of the public. The government
went through the motions of public hearings bowing to the public pressure.
However this came too late in the day when all the details of the project
had been finalised and served little purpose. It was apparent during
the hearings that the government had already made up its mind regardless
of objections, which were brushed aside.
Since the opposition to the project was gaining momentum,
it appeared the government too seemed tentative and hesitant to go ahead
with the project. This is reflected in government coming out with announcement
several times during past two years that the project would start soon
and yet nothing happened. Now comes the news (Times of India dt. 10/9/02)
that the government will take on an experimental basis 62 km of two
lane highway instead of 4 lanes. Th reason given is that 4-lane full
length will take nearly 7 years while 62 km road can be completed in
a year. There is also an announcement in Andolana of 22/8/02 inviting
suggestions from the public in respect of intended macro development
project for revised Bangalore-Mysore infrastructure corridor area. The
suggestions have to be given to the concerned authorities within two
months of the publication of the notice which is dated 17/8/02. These
are confusing signals.
In the following an attempt is made for the information
of the general public purely from technical considerations to put facts
in their proper perspective. The intention is that the public can take
an informed decision on merits of the case.
Main considerations that weighed with the government
to opt for the Expressway project as reflected in the Executive Summary
prepared by NICE Ltd are as follows.
1.. It describes the EXISTING Bangalore-Mysore highway
(SH 17) and the road passing through Kanakapura, Malavalli etc (SH 86)
as narrow, winding and with poor surface.
2.. SH 17 presently carries 8300 vehicles per day and for most of the
length it carries 6800 vehicles per day.
3.. Traffic on Expressway when constructed would carry 27,000 to 34,000
vehicles per day by 2021 consisting of traffic diverted from the existing
roadways, traffic generated from annual growth and traffic generated
from the proposed townships.
4.. Reduced distance of 111 km.
5.. Saving due to reduced travelling time ie 11/2 hours instead of 3
hours.
6.. Substantial fuel saving due to increased vehicle speed.
7.. Saving due to reduction of accidents.
8.. Project will cost Rs. 2000 crore.
Reality of the situation is as follows.
1.. To describe the condition of SH 17 as narrow, winding
and with poor surface is highly exaggerated and biased. In Ramnagar
and Cennapatna the road runs as divided highway. Government of Karnataka
is improving the whole length to 4-lanes and project is under preparation
for the remaining length. Bangalore to Malvali a distance of 105 km
is now a part of National Highway No. 209 and comes under the Central
Government who maintain it to international standards. Remaining stretch
of SH 86 from Malavalli to Mysore a distance of 45 km is presently having
intermediate road width of 5.5 m
2.. SH 17 which caries 8300 vehicles in few stretched is performing
satisfactorily and cars even run at 80km/hr. When it is developed into
4 lanes which is underway it can carry 16600 vehicles perday (8300x2)
3.. If the carrying capacity of Expressway is around 30,500 (average)
assuming the traffic projections as valid, when SH17 is eventually improved
the pressure on proposed Expressway would be reduced to 13,900 (30,500-16,600).
If Malavalli to Mysore link is also declare as a National Highway link
which can easily done if the government makes a case, it can carry another
8000 vehicles. This leaves about 5900 vehicles for the Expressway. This
balance can be met with doubling the railway and eventually electifying
the route. Thus there is no necessity for Expressway at all. In fact
it is time that Government moves the Centre to declare SH 17 AS A National
Higway as it satisfies all the requirements.
4.. Distance of 111km is between the outer ring roads of Bangalore and
Mysore . The actual distance from the city centre works out to 125 km.
The distance along SH 17 is 140 KM and via Malavalli works out to 150
km.
5.. There is only a marginal difference in travel time. More over on
Expressway normally provides for comfort stops with the state of the
art facilities. These are additional attractions where travelling public
stop and eventually the time taken to reach Mysore will not vary significantly
compared to other routes specially when the route of NH 209 is extended
to Mysore and SH 17 is declared as NH. More over it must be realised
even in advanced countries like USA the speed limit is 55mph (88kmph)
except in few stretches where it is 70mph (112kmph). Another factor
has to be considered. Out of total vehicle population Buses, Trucks
and LCVs FORM 57%. Is it possible to envisage these vehicles hurtling
at such speed for which the Expressway has been designed?
6.. As per World Bank aided Road User Cost Study carried out by the
Road Research Institute, Delhi there is an optimal speed and any increase
in speed such as 120 km for which the Expressway is being designed the
fuel consumption would be nearly double. Even assuming only 30% extra
fuel due to increae in speed rough calculations indicate the total consumption
will increse by 8403 te for petrol and 77,373 for deisel. Apart from
extra expenditure involved the country can ill afford this profligacy
when we are already feeling the pinch. Another factor has been omitted
about higher pollution at higher speed.
7.. Although saving due to reduction is theoretically valid, there is
another danger. When accidents happen at high speeds it will be diasterous
as several vehicles will be involved. More over we must consider the
Indian reality where driving competancyis poor. There are othe peculiar
conditions in India. For example on Bombay-Poona Expressway 85% of the
accidents were due to bursting of tyres.
8.. Project will cost substantially more than Rs. 2000 crores. More
likely it will be around Rs. 6000 crores by the time project gets completed.
9.. There is another important factor to be considered . Expressway
would mean provision of assured supply of water and power to the five
Townships to be developed. We can illaffford this when already we are
facing severe shortage on both these fronts.
In view of the factors mentioned let the people decide.
H.R.Bapu Satyanarayana
Convener, MGP.
"
vimbapu@sancharnet.in
|
|
6 |
"Did
you know that Karnataka Government is proposing a Bangalore Mysore corridor
project, a world class golf course, super rich urban communites in Bangalore/Mysore
sector, high class living in 5 cities between Bangalore and Mysore. This
project, if implemented, will directly affect over 180 villages in four
districts and would potentially displace close to 200,000 people and destruction
of 21000 acres of farm, forest and riverine areas. Apart
from above displacement, it will also destroy fragile eco system of Cauvery,
destroy large swaths of forest lands of in Badamanavarthi Kaval range
abutting the Bannerghatta National Park. The
entire cost of above destruction is around approx 4000 crores.
So whats the alternative? Should we live in old age? Should we not have
the basic need of travelling smoothly? Yes
there is an alternative which is to repair, streamline and widen the existing
road between Bangalore and Mysore and make it four lane motorable road.
This will take care of increasing traffic and provide smooth directed
ride.
The entire cost of this smart move is approx 300 crores. Even
Karnatka CM Respected Krishna is against the first proposal. The deciding
meeting for the above 2 proposals is in a couple of days. Please
go through the attached documents and email/fax/write to Hon'ble CM Mr.Krishna.
The
email id is cmkrishna@bangaloreit.com and cc Leo Saldana who is spearheading
this campaign at esg@bgl.vsnl.net.in.
If you have friends in Bangalore do mail to them and ask them to write
to CM.
Thanks,
Bala.
rbalachan@comcast.net
top |
|
7 |
"Dear
Sir,
I am Kishen Das , a software engineer from Bangalore . I have been closely
observing this Bangalore Mysore Infrastructure Corridor Project and I
strongly feel that this project is going to affect thousands of farmers
as the proposed project will make inroads into the thousands of acres
of forests, farms and water bodies. As a side affect of this project the
birds like the herons, egret, cormorants, etc will lose their roosting
sites, also there is vast amount insect diversity that is going to be
affected very badly. I don't think we should try to improve the sophistication
of urban life at the cost of our farmers, flora and fauna. Also I seriously
doubt whether this project is going to be completed on time.
I am attaching two documents with this mail. First document is an appeal
to karnataka CM from Environment Support Group . All the points that I
have mentioned has been discussed in length in this document. Second document
is a collection of press stories on the CM's recent statements on BMIC
I somehow feel that the current government is not concerned
about nature and its conservation as it used to be during Mrs Indira
Gandhi's reign. Hope you take some action immediately to stop this project.
Your's sincerely,
Kishen Das
(GXS, ITC-Trainee)" Kishen.Das@gxs.com
top
|
|
8 |
An
American voice against the BMIC
"Shri.
S. M. Krishna
Chief Minister
Government of Karnataka
Vidhana Soudha
Bangalore 560001
17 December 2003
Reg.: Appeal
to Shelve BMIC Project permanently
Respected
Sir,
I visited
your state of Karnataka in January and February of this year as an exchange
student from the United States. I learned much from my time there, and
benefited greatly from the assistance of the Environment Support Group
of Bangalore for their instruction, and from the gratitude and insight
of Ms. Rego, my host and a former Member of Parliament. During my time
in Karnataka I spent several days in the farming village of Mahadevapura,
walking through the fields and talking with the farmers. They expressed
the fear and uncertainty that they hold because the proposed BMIC corridor
would cut through their village and displace them from their land. They
admit that they will be forced to migrate to either Bangalore or Mysore,
where they fear their lack of education will prevent them from earning
a livelihood necessary to care for their families.
There is
no question that an investment in such an infrastructure would greatly
benefit the economic development of the region. However, I struggle
knowing that there are less disruptive ways to achieve this end. The
expansion of SH-17, the doubling of the Bangalore Mysore railway line
and the strengthening of NH-209 and its link to Mysore (Kanakapura Road)
could together remain a long term solution in supporting progressive
urban and infrastructure development to the benefit of all. The execution
of the BMIC project would devastate the lives of the farmers whom I
met, threaten their children's future, and contribute to the social
stress of your cities. Please consider the needs of your threatened
farmers, they need your leadership and protection.
Yours sincerely,
Brendan
Robert Moriarty
Class
of 2004
Swarthmore College
500 College Ave
Swarthmore, PA 19081
United States of America
bmoriar1@swarthmore.edu
610.574.7148 (phone)
top
|
|
9 |
Cancel BMIC Project permanently "Shri. S. M. Krishna
Chief Minister
Government of Karnataka
Vidhana Soudha
Bangalore 560001
19 December 2003
Reg.: Cancel BMIC Project permanently
Respected Shri. S.M. Krishna,
I am very pleased to note your recent indignation on
the pathetic progress on the Bangalore Mysore Infrastructure Corridor
project (BMIC), when inaugurating the 4-laning works by Karnataka Road
Development Corporation Ltd. (KRDCL) of the Maddur-Bangalore section
of SH-17 (Bangalore Mysore Highway).
As I have noted in my previous email correspondence
with you, expansion of SH-17 would indeed eliminate the need for BMIC.
This expansion has much less impact on the local environment and on
the state's financial resources than the odious BMIC project. Hence,
your decision to expand the SH-17 is laudable.
On this note, it is also imperative that you CANCEL
this inefficient BMIC project. There is simply no need to waste money
on this project. You would save the State of Karnataka enormous losses
and an un-sustainable financial burden, while also protecting the farmers
of the Bangalore Mysore region from gross
injustice, if you were to firmly state that the BMIC project would be
abandoned.
Given BMIC's flawed model for urbanization based on
outdated concepts from the US, the serious doubts about capacity of
NICE to build BMIC as indicated by the inordinate time spent with little
to show for it, the questionable allotment of public lands to NICE,
the lack of transparency in the BMIC clearance, and the disastrous social
and environmental consequences, it is surprising that the project has
been allowed to continue for so long.
Cancelling BMIC would also win you immense support from
hundreds of thousands of directly affected farming and other project
affected families who have
been tormented for several years now by the BMIC proponents and Land
Acquisition officers to give up their land. At an election year, such
support from the farmers could be very helpful. Therefore, I urge you
to be just and visionary by rejecting the flawed BMIC project, once
and for all.
Yours sincerely,
Dr. Ananth Chikkatur
New York
ap_chikkatur@yahoo.com
top
|